The genie is out of the bottle and won't go back in, and they're not even the ones that opened that bottle. If your complaint is that Stable Diffusion exists then I don't know what to tell you. Much like an artist already had to have the talent and skills, but likely looked at a picture to make sure they were getting details right. Testing didn't build the algorithm, the building had to come first. ![]() To claim that the ALGORITHM should be considered illegal because they used images online when TESTING it is roughly like saying that any art that an artist puts out after looking at a photo or another painting that he hasn't personally paid for should be illegal. But regardless, what they released had zero data in it, because what they released wasn't the model. And given that they were trying to train a model, I would bet they'd go with the pre-tagged content over having to download and tag a bunch themselves. But as a software developer myself, its just as likely that they used any number of sites with libraries of licensed AND TAGGED placeholder images. Is it possible that model was trained using data "stolen" from publicly available images? Possibly. Is it possible that they used images on the internet to train their internal testing model on? 100%. You don't seem to understand what Stable Diffusion actually is. I'd test it by reverting back-and-forth between Photo and C1 as the default app and see AP appear and disappeared from the contextual menu.So you are saying that the developers of stable diffusion developed their algorithm without testing it with stolen data? ![]() Go to capture one and check it out in "Edit with" and "Open with." Affinity Photo appears as an option. Window Start menu > Settings > Apps > Default apps > Choose default apps by file type > scroll to your file type that you use in capture one > click on the icon to the right > Choose Affinity Photo when the Choose An App contextual window popup then you are done. ![]() You can change the file type in either the properties (right-click on the file, select Properties then change "Open with" setting or via the Window Settings. The problem with the disappearance of Affinity Photo happen after I'd had made the raw file changed. So prior to that mistake C1 showed Affinity Photo, Designer, and Publisher in both the "Edit with" and "Open with" via contextual menu. I had changed the file type of the sony raw file via properties and forgotten I'd did that. I'd experienced this issue as well but since resolved it. But for some panoramas it created a good result, projection-wise, apart from these dirty areas. The warp tool did not work for me very well (maybe with more experience) to improve the stitch when needed. ![]() The seams of the stitching are barely recognisable most of the time, I had one crash, no projection options, the only good thing is the brush, but the brush is absolutly needed in AP because of this bug with dirty areas in many highlight portions adjacent to high contrast edges. Maybe Serif should not have looked too close at PS when designing this panorama wizard. On a side note, multiple images can open in Affinty when called by Edit with in C1 but these opened images are useless if you want to do a panorama or other stacking, as Affinity cannot create a panorama from already opened images, you need to call a special wizard, then open the images with a explorer dialog, not even drag and drop is possible, and then destructively stitch your panorama. Did you check the file extension default programs? In C1 20.0.2 I can Edit and Open with as it should be. I downloaded and installed Affinity Photo yesterday, it installed and registered correctly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |